Farage Faces Backlash Over Immigration Proposal

Nigel Farage has encountered cross-party condemnation following his alarming pledge to abolish the primary route for legal immigrants towards permanent settlement in the UK. This proposal threatens to impact hundreds of thousands of immigrants currently living in the country.

Criticism from Labour Leaders

The leader of Reform UK has been sharply criticized by Labour politicians, who argue that his stance could “break up families” and promote division within society.

Details of the Proposal

In a contentious press conference on Monday, Farage claimed that his policy aims to prevent 800,000 individuals from becoming eligible for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) between 2026 and 2030. He labeled this group the “Boriswave,” asserting that they are predominantly young, low-skilled, and “a significant burden on the state.”

Farage has announced plans to eliminate ILR, forcing immigrants to reapply for visas every five years with strict salary and English language requirements. He left the possibility open for the breakup of families and suggested that rights to remain could be revoked for Ukrainians and Hongkongers who settled via special resettlement programs.

Responses from Downing Street and Labour

Downing Street responded by stating that the UK is at a crucial juncture, with Keir Starmer representing “national renewal” against the “division and decline” proposed by Reform UK. Starmer is set to deliver a significant speech before the upcoming Labour conference, countering Farage’s divisive rhetoric.

Scrutiny of Financial Claims

Labour’s focus largely centers around the feasibility of Farage’s proposals rather than ethical concerns. Reform UK claims that the abolition of ILR would save £230 billion, a figure disputed by its source, the Centre for Policy Studies, which advised against its use due to inaccuracies.

Impacts on Essential Services

When questioned about the potential consequences on sectors relying on foreign labor, such as the NHS, Farage suggested a limited visa route for high-demand skills but faced immediate backlash. Nicola Ranger, general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, condemned the proposal as “abhorrent,” saying it disrespects the contributions of migrant staff in healthcare.

Bipartisan Concerns and Comparisons

Other political leaders, including Sadiq Khan and Ed Davey, expressed fears of a repeat of the Windrush scandal due to the lack of consideration for the existing immigrant community. Criticism has also been directed at the logistical unfeasibility of the proposals, with multiple leaders describing them as “half-baked” and unworkable.

Final Thoughts

Sunder Katwala of the British Future think tank emphasizes that the threats posed by this proposal strike at the heart of belonging and community in the UK. As discussions surrounding immigration continue, the focus remains on balancing fairness and the rights of individuals who have already built their lives in the UK.

Published: 2025-09-22 18:12:00 | Source: www.theguardian.com